<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html>
<head>
<link rel="shortcut icon" href="/favicon.ico" />
<title>A Monsanto Executives' Nightmare: Movement to ban genetically engineered crops in California grows. </title>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" />
<link title="default" media="screen" href="/styles2.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" />
<link title="print" media="screen" href="/stylesprint2.css" rel="alternate stylesheet" type="text/css" />
<link media="print" href="/stylesprint2.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" />
</head>
<body>  
<!--#include virtual="/inserts/header.htm" -->
<div id="container">
  <div id="maincontent">      
	<div id="text" style="font-size:16px"> 
	 <h1>Monsanto Executives' Nightmare </h1>
	 <h2 align="center">Movement to ban genetically engineered crops in California
	   grows. 
      </h2>
	 <p>&nbsp;</p>
	 <div id="byline">
		  <!--#include virtual="/inserts/gizmos.htm" --> 
        <p>By Mike Lee <br />
          First published by the <a href="http://sacbee.com" target="_blank">Sacramento Bee</a>, July 15, 2004
		     </p>
             <div class="clearboth"></div> 
      </div>
      <p>Efforts to ban biotech crops that began last year as a brew pub
      brainstorm in Ukiah are maturing into a statewide political force. </p>
      <p> Four November ballot initiatives will attempt to mimic the landmark
              <a href="http://reclaimdemocracy.org/articles_2004/croplife_maxxam_lose_california.html" target="_blank">Measure
              H</a> in Mendocino County as anti-biotech activists push for
              prohibitions on genetically engineered crops. </p>
            <p> While the campaign still has a shoestring budget, it's adding
              the trappings of a political machine: public relations strategies,
              official spokesmen, ties to a national organic association and
              fund raising for a war chest to fight the biotech industry in the
              state Legislature and in court. </p>
            <p> The movement also is racking up successes, with ballot measures
              approved this week by supervisors in Butte, San Luis Obispo, Marin
              and Humboldt counties. At least eight other counties are targeted
              for similar ballot measures, which could create a threat to biotech's
              future in the nation's largest farming state. </p>
            <p> "It's pretty doggone amazing, the network that has arisen in
              such a short time," said Doug Mosel, who in March helped make Mendocino
              the first county in the nation to ban the cultivation of biotech
              crops. Voters passed the measure by a margin of 56 percent to 44
              percent. </p>
            <p> Biotech industry leaders are monitoring the rising power of their
              opponents and facing the possibility that county-level momentum
              could spur a statewide campaign, said George Gough, Roseville-based
              government affairs manager for the Monsanto Co. </p>
            <p> "While this still is certainly a grass-roots, county-by-county
              effort, it may be quickly becoming not so grass roots," he said. </p>
            <p> Speculation is high that biotech backers will seek state legislation
              to end county-by-county bans. </p>
            <p> "My sense is that they cannot afford to lose a key county like
              Butte," said Ryan Zinn, campaign coordinator at the <a href="http://www.organicconsumers.org/" target="_blank">Organic
              Consumers Association</a> in San Francisco. </p>
            <p> Industry leaders have revealed little about their intentions.
              When asked, they typically repeat the same statement: Voters shouldn't
              trounce farmers' rights to plant what crops they want. </p>
            <p> Most current biotech crops give farmers easier control of bugs
              and weeds, though companies are working on other plants that produce
              drug compounds. One of the most common biotech tricks allows cultivated
              plants to survive sprays of common weedkillers, letting farmers
              kill weeds without harming crops. </p>
            <p> So far, it's not clear who's taking the lead for business interests.
              <a href="http://www.croplifeamerica.org/" target="_blank">CropLife America</a>, which unsuccessfully bankrolled opposition to
              the Mendocino measure with more than $600,000, said it's staying
              out of the new round of political battles brewing in California
              counties. </p>
            <p> The Sacramento-based Western Plant Health Association, a farm
              chemical and biotech trade group, is advising farmers about how
              to mount opposition but is making no other plans public. "We are
              very concerned, and we are still looking at all of our options," said
              spokeswoman Sara Miller. </p>
            <p> The California Farm Bureau Federation, which officially supports
              biotechnology, is leaving response to local chapters, most of which
              are trying to stay neutral. </p>
            <p> Meanwhile, anti-biotech forces are gaining sophistication and
              confidence. They oppose genetic engineering because they fear pollution
              of non-biotech crops and the potential loss of exports to biotech-wary
              countries such as Japan. </p>
            <p> After their March win, <a href="http://www.gmofreemendo.com/" target="_blank">GMO-Free
                Mendocino</a> leaders invited groups
              from across the state to learn how to copy that victory. They are
              in contact with leaders of other county movements, offering advice
              and encouragement. </p>
            <p> This week, GMO-Free Mendocino officially joined arms with the
              Organic Consumers Association, which bills itself as the nation's
              largest public-interest group dedicated to a healthy food system.
              The association claims 90,000 California members. </p>
            <p> The goal of the newly minted BioDemocracy Alliance - the two
              groups' joint effort - is to prepare for "the biotech bullies" who
              could challenge the county bans in court or the state Capitol. </p>
            <p> "(The alliance) does add to our own sophistication, which we
              know we need in the face of the incredible resources of money,
              people and influence the industry has," said Mendocino's Mosel. </p>
            <p> The Organic Consumers Association is canvassing for money - mostly
              donations between $25 and $50 - and support in San Francisco. Next
              up are other counties such as Santa Cruz, where the organization
              wants to take advantage of support from organic-food enthusiasts. </p>
            <p> The association also is trying to generate enough pre-emptive
              calls and e-mails to legislators to stop any bill that aims to
              undo county ballot measures opposing biotech crops. </p>
            <h5>&copy; 2004 Sacramento Bee </h5>
            <h4>Go to <a href="/index.html">Home Page</a></h4>           
	    <!--#include virtual="/inserts/sendthispage.html" -->           
        <!--#include virtual="/inserts/fairuse.html" -->
		<!--#include virtual="/inserts/footer.htm" -->
    </div>
  </div>
  <!--#include virtual="/inserts/leftnavn.html" -->    
</div>
</body>
</html>