<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html>
<head>
<link rel="shortcut icon" href="/favicon.ico" />
<title>Local Ownership Pays-Multiplier Effect</title>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" />
<link media="screen" title="default" href="/styles2.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" />
<link media="screen" title="print" href="/stylesprint2.css" rel="alternate stylesheet" type="text/css" />
<link media="print" title="print" href="/stylesprint2.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" />
</head>
<body>
<!--#include virtual="/inserts/header.htm" -->
<div id="container">
  <div id="maincontent">      
	<div id="text" style="font-size:16px"> 
          <div id="header">
            <h4>New Studies:</h4>
            <h1>Local Ownership Pays Off for Communities</h1></div>
          <div id="byline">
			  <!--#include virtual="/inserts/gizmos.htm" -->
			  <p>By Jennifer Rockne and Jeff Milchen <br />
		      Published May 2003</p>
              <div class="clearboth"></div> 
          </div>
        <p>We've written 
            frequently about the importance of independent and local ownership 
            of businesses to enhance both community economic prosperity and democracy, 
            but the studies available for economic evidence have been less specific 
            and older than we'd like. So we were excited to see new studies in 
          this realm that provide up-to-date information. </p>
          <p> <strong>The Multiplier 
          Effect Quantified</strong><br />
            First is an economic impact study done by <a href="http://www.civiceconomics.com/" target="_blank">Civic 
            Economics</a> in Austin, Texas (population 657,000). It revealed that 
            each dollar spent at two locally owned book and music stores, Book 
            People and Waterloo Records, creates more than three times the local 
            economic activity of dollars spent at a typical Borders Books &amp; 
            Music Corp. store.</p>
        <p> The study was 
          initiated to provide hard data with which to evaluate a potential 25,000 
          square foot Borders store as part of a new retail development on the 
          same block as those independent businesses. The two local retailers 
          opened their books for the study. Civic Economics utilized numerous 
          sources to determine the Borders impact, including interviews with former 
          employees, the company's public records, and studies of similar stores 
          conducted by Bank of America.</p>
          <p> The factors accounting 
            for the difference in community payback are familiar to our readers, 
            but we 're glad to bolster the empirical evidence behind common sense: 
          </p><p>
            1) the local businesses have larger payrolls, employing their own 
            ad writers, buyers, accountants, and other positions that chains centralize 
            in a single headquarters.</p><p>
            2) locally owned businesses make more of their own purchases locally.</p><p>
            3) more of the profits at locally owned businesses recirculate in 
            the community.</p><p>
            The study also included the competitive impact of the proposed Borders 
            store and projected that half of Borders' sales would be siphoned 
            from Waterloo and Book People. The development that includes Borders 
            is slated to use $2.1 million in public subsidies--another hole blown 
            in the myth of the &quot;free market.&quot;</p>
          <p><strong>Bigger 
            Isn't Better for Economic Return</strong><br />
            The second study demonstrates that growth does not necessarily mean 
            increased net revenue--in fact, many types of development actually 
            drain local economies. <a href="http://www.tischlerassociates.com/cost.html" target="_blank">Tischler 
            &amp; Associates</a> studied various types of residential and commercial 
            developments in <a href="http://www.city-data.com/city/Barnstable-Town-Massachusetts.html" target="_blank">Barnstable, 
            Mass</a> (population 48,000) and compared the tax revenue they generated 
            with the cost of providing additional required services. The findings? 
            Big box retail, shopping centers, and fast-food restaurants cost taxpayers 
            more than they produce.</p>
        <p> The biggest drain 
          is fast-food restaurants with a net annual deficit of $5,168 per 1,000 
          square feet, with big box retail developments at a loss of $468 per 
          1,000 square feet, and shopping centers at $314 per 1,000 square feet.</p>
        <p>Smaller specialty 
          retail (not big box &quot;category killers&quot;) was found to generate 
          positive returns, returning $326 per 1,000 square feet to the community. 
          Other<br />
          positive producers include business parks, offices, and hotels.</p>
          <p>So why the higher 
            costs from big box and fast food development? The biggest expenses 
            generated came from higher road maintenance costs and greater demand 
            for public safety services--especially police calls for commercial 
            crime. </p>
          <p><strong>Hidden Costs</strong><br />
            One commmunity that openly embraced chain superstores in the past 
            decade was was Pineville, NC. But Pineville now has put the brakes 
            on such development growth. It recently tightened its zoning rules 
            and turned down two retail developments, including a Wal-Mart Inc. 
            &quot;supercenter.&quot;</p>
          <p> The decision 
            came after city officials had to raise taxes to subsidize all the 
            added public costs generated by big box stores and strip development. 
            They projected that Wal-Mart would create the need to hire two new 
            police officers at a cost of $120,000 per year, far exceeding the 
            municipal revenue the store would generate. Commercial properties 
            account for 96 percent of all police calls in Pineville. Even though 
            a growing number of communites now charge impact fees for the initial 
            costs generated by big box developments, the public pays for their 
            ongoing drain on resources.</p>
          <p>Stacy Mitchell, 
            senior researcher at the <a href="http://newrules.org" target="_blank">New Rules
            Project</a>  explains why locally-owned
            businesses typically create less demand for police services. &quot;Criminals 
            passing through seem to prefer the anonymity of a Wal-Mart store along 
            the highway to the intimacy of Bob's Hardware on Main Street. Local 
            retailers don't usually call the police for every bad check or shoplifting 
            incident, while chain stores often have a policy of prosecuting every 
            offense.&quot;</p>
          <p>Many more communities 
            are coming to grips with the public law enforcement costs created 
            by big box stores. In East Lampeter, Pennsylvania, District Justice 
            Ronald Savage has added two days to the monthly court calendar just 
            to deal with crimes at Wal-Mart, which account for about one-quarter 
            of the town's non-traffic citations, criminal misdemeanors, and felony 
            complaints. </p>
          <h3 class="red">Updates-- 
            September 25, 2003:</h3>
          <p>* Once the people of Austin learned the true costs of 
            the proposed public subsidy for the Borders development, the subsidy
            was blocked. Left to try to compete in a free market against a successful
            local business, Borders decided it could not -- the store was not
            built. </p>
          <p>* A survey published in September, 2003 produced results 
            nearly identical to those in Austin regarding the multiplier effect
             for dollars spent at locally owned businesses. The analysis by the
             Institute for Local Self-Reliance and Friends of Midcoast Maine
            tracked  the revenue and expenditures of eight locally owned businesses
            in  the Maine towns of Rockland, Camden, and Belfast and compared
            their  economic impact to that of two corporate chains; Target and
            Wal-Mart.  The local businesses represented a range of goods and
            services, and  collectively employed 62 people and had sales of $5.7
            million in 2002. 
          </p>
          <p>The survey found that the businesses spent 44.6 percent 
            of their revenue within the surrounding two counties. Another 8.7 
            percent was spent elsewhere in the state of Maine. The four largest 
            components of this local spending were: wages and benefits paid to 
            local employees; goods and services purchased from other local businesses; 
            profits that accrued to local owners; and taxes paid to local and 
            state government. </p>
          <p>All eight of the surveyed businesses banked with locally 
            owned banks. They purchased some inventory from local manufacturers, 
            advertised in local newspapers, and hired local accountants, printers, 
            internet service providers, and repair people. </p>
          <p>The other 46.7 percent of their revenue left the state. 
            This out-of-state spending included inventory purchased from out-of-state 
            companies, mortgage interest, rent, credit card fees, supplies, insurance, 
            and equipment leasing. </p>
          <p>A similar expenditure profile was created for a big 
            box retailer. Because national retailers do not reveal detailed financial 
            information, the study estimated expenditures (payroll, supplies, 
            services, utilities, taxes, etc.) based on national data, statements 
            by company officials, and employment and property tax information 
            on one of its Maine outlets. </p>
          <p>The survey found that the chain returns 14.1 percent 
            of its revenue to the local economy, mostly in the form of payroll. 
            The analysis concludes that expanding local businesses would be a 
            better economic development strategy for the region than bringing 
            in large chains. </p>
          <p>The survey also found that the local businesses contributed 
            0.4 percent of their gross revenue to charity. That's four times as 
            much, relative to overall sales, as Wal-Mart gave to charity in 2002, 
            and twice as much as Target gave. </p>
          <h5><strong>Editors' 
            note:</strong> The Maine study involves a sample too small to use 
            for drawing broad conclusions, but in combination with related studies, 
        it provides strong support.</h5>
          <h5>See the summary 
            of &quot;<a href="http://home-town-advantage.c.tclk.net/maabt4Zaa0K8Qb2MOeKb/" target="_blank" class="asmall">The 
            Economic Impact of Locally Owned Businesses vs. Chains: A Case Study 
            in Midcoast Maine</a>&quot; (pdf document).</h5>
          <p><em>The Austin study cited is available at: </em><a href="http://www.liveablecity.org" target="_blank">liveablecity.org</a>. 
            <em>See the </em><a href="http://amiba.net" target="_blank">American 
            Independent Business Alliance</a><em> (an organization initiated by 
            two ReclaimDemocracy.org staff to help communities support their independent 
            businesses and resist corporate displacement of local businesses) 
            or the </em><a href="http://newrules.org">New Rules Project</a><em> 
          for much more related information.</em></p>
          <h5><em>This article first appeared in the spring 2003 issue of <a href="/newsletter.html">The
          Insurgent</a>, ReclaimDemocracy.org's quarterly print newsletter.</em></h5>
          <h5 align="center"><em>*&nbsp; *&nbsp; *</em></h5>
          <p class="arial"><strong>Related articles</strong>:<br />
            <a href="bigbanks_bigfees.html">* Bigger
               Banks Mean Bigger Fees<br />
            </a><a href="independent_drugstores_beat_chains.html">* Independent
              Drugstores Beat the Chains</a></p>
          <p align="center" class="arial"><a href="index.html">More features</a> on Independent Business issues  </p>
          <!--#include virtual="/inserts/sendthispage.html" -->
<!--#include virtual="/inserts/footer.htm" -->
   </div>
  </div>
      <!--#include virtual="/inserts/leftnavn.html" -->  
</div>
</body>
</html>
